People are getting concerned about cell towers but according to this report WiFi radiation in schools can be 3 times worse than cell tower radiation, see http://electricsense.com/2726/wifi-in-schools-gives-off-3-times-as-much-radiation-as-cell-towers/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39490660/ns/health-more_health_news/

But you should definitely go to your doctor and tell him/her what you wrote above, so they know what to look for. Better to find out if anything’s wrong sooner rather than later!

You may also want to get your sperm tested (sperm count, motility, etc.) even just to have as a reference point. Then get it re-tested when you’re ready to have kids and see where it’s at, if it’s improved, etc. I’m assuming that you are either no longer carrying your cell phone on your body or (hopefully) hardly using it at all.

That’s about all I can think of….

good luck and let me know if you find anything.

I am doing research into the dangers of emr. You mention the situation in Singapore back in 2001 where many 20-year olds were having heart-attacks, probably linked to the fashion of wearing your mobile phones on a cord around your neck. I have been searching for an article on that, but I was unable to find it. Perhaps you can find another source for this? Would you mind sending it to my emailaddress?

Thanks,
Jasper, the Netherlands

This will inevitably uncover another “inconvenient truth” – that cordless phones and Wi-Fi in the home and school are not a good idea if you want to stay in vigorous health, and the we need to change the way we and our kids use cell phones (if they have one).

To contact me, use the contact form on the contact page of http://www.citizensforsafetechnology.org.

Carl Katz, Director, Citizens for Safe Technology.
********************************
Hi Jini,

Carl Katz here. I’m an advocate around the “no wi-fi and cell phones in school” issue and made the front page of The Province in Sept. 2008. Also,m French CBC TV in Vancouver did a seven minute investigative piece on the group I started at my children’s school at the time in Vancouver – we had an 80 signature “change Wi-Fi to wired connection” petition that we presented to the French School board (which they fought vigorously).

I am working with Una St. Clair-Moniz on this issue who also made TV, radio and the papers last year. Una is executive director of CItizens for Safe Technology – I am a director.

Una and I are very deep into this process – we have met with the Health and Safety of the BCTF committee recently to present on this subject – there is significant concern on their part. This past Tues. night Una and I presented same to the PAC at my kids’ school, Peace Arch Elementary in White Rock in Surrey School District #36.

I think that there may be a lot of synergy in what we are doing.

Regards,

Carl
******************
Hi Jini,

Your letter appeared in Martin Weatherall’s nightly EMF newsletter digest.

I am very up on the science and tend to go with the theory that it’s the secondary Informaton Carryng Radio Wave (ICRW) that causes bio-effects and symptoms. The actual carrier waves (800, 850, 1900 Mhz in Canada for cell phones and 2.4, 5.8 Ghz for Wi-Fi) are supposedly not problematic – it’s when you piggyback data on the carrier wave (music, voice, data, video) that the secondary ICRW comes into play.

Did you see the article in GQ magazine this month? One of the top five articles on the subject in the last few years in my opinion:

http://bit.ly/aAQrzN

Talk to you soon,

Carl

http://www.gq.com/cars-gear/gear-and-gadgets/201002/warning-cell-phone-radiation?currentPage=1

Some of the comments left after this article are really good too.

C Hoch